Weekly Roundup: Vessel Traffic Up, Legislative Crossroads, and “Liberation Day” Disrupts Global Trade

Good afternoon, Mis Amigos Maritimos —

This week at the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound, we observed modest uptick in vessel arrivals (hooray), delivered critical testimony in Olympia (hooray), and closely monitored global trade turbulence (boo) stemming from a bold new economic posture out of Washington, D.C.

Let’s dive into the details:


Executive Summary

  • Vessel arrivals increased 12% overall this week.

  • I testified in opposition to tax increases on stevedoring services (aka Senate Bill 5794).

  • April 2, now coined “Liberation Day,” introduced major shifts in global trade dynamics, with potential ripple effects for Washington’s ports.


Vessel Traffic Snapshot

Across all vessel categories, we saw an increase from 42 to 47 arrivals, led by tankers and container ships. The full breakdown:

Category Last Week This Week % Change
Bulk 7 5 -29%
Container 14 16 +14%
General 1 1 0%
RO/RO 2 2 0%
Tanker 9 12 +33%
Tug/ATB 2 3 +50%
Vehicles 6 7 +17%

Port-specific activity also showed a 20% increase in total dockings, with significant jumps in Cherry Point, Everett, and Olympia. Tacoma saw a slight decrease, while Seattle traffic rose by 27%.


Situational Awareness

  • Weather: Mixed conditions with generally clear skies in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and mild winds.

  • Disruptions: No maritime incidents reported locally.


Legislative Engagement

This week, I drove to Olympia and testified against SB 5794, which would sharply raise the cost of doing business on Washington’s working waterfront. The bill proposes a Public Utility Tax and increases in B&O tax on stevedoring—a move that could disproportionately harm port workers, especially in communities of color.

We remain committed to:

  • Supporting bills that promote maritime workforce development and economic resilience.

  • Opposing policies that add unnecessary burden to vital maritime services.

🎧 Listen to our new podcast episode featuring Reps. Julia Reed (coming next week!) and Greg Nance—discussing legislative priorities, career pathways, and what inspires their service—now live.


Technology & Data

  • Our AIS network remains strong: 100% of towers operational with >99.9% uptime.

  • Ongoing database optimizations continue to streamline ship movement tracking and port performance analytics.


Looking Ahead

  • April 8 marks the Fiscal Committee cutoff—a key moment in this year’s legislative calendar.

  • We’re finalizing participation in the ECHO Southern Resident Killer Whale Slowdown Program.

  • Preparing for the Harbor Safety Committee meeting on May 7—agenda to be released soon.


Spotlight: “Liberation Day” & Global Trade

April 2, 2025, now dubbed “Liberation Day,” saw the implementation of sweeping new tariffs under the Trump Administration—both blanket and targeted. While the immediate effects are still unfolding, early market indicators reflect volatility and uncertainty.

Washington’s maritime economy sits at a critical juncture. We are monitoring:

  • Freight rate fluctuations

  • Port call patterns

  • Trade index movements

Insights shared at this week’s joint Seattle/Tacoma Transportation Club meeting with the Federal Reserve were valuable—though no direct forecasts were given, the message was clear: flexibility and preparedness are more vital than ever.


Stay informed. Stay connected. And as always, thank you for your partnership in keeping our maritime gateway efficient, resilient, and future-ready.

– The Marine Exchange of Puget Sound

Weekly Roundup: Legislative Moves, Stormy Skies, and a Push for Clarity

By Patrick Gallagher, Executive Director, Marine Exchange of Puget Sound

Each week, I share a briefing that summarizes maritime trends, port operations, and relevant policy developments shaping our region. Here’s what moved the needle this week across the Puget Sound maritime landscape.


Legislative Push: All Eyes on SB 5794

I made two trips to Olympia this week, both centered around Senate Bill 5794, which we oppose. On Tuesday, I attended a policy briefing on the bill. The next day, I returned to interview Representatives Greg Nance and Julia Reed for our upcoming Maritime Morning Brief podcast episode.

SB 5794 is framed as an effort to clean up the tax code, but it poses real risk to maritime logistics and workforce incentives. I’ve committed to testify in opposition this coming Monday during the Senate Ways & Means Committee hearing at 4:00 PM.

This is a Priority 1 issue for the Marine Exchange and one we believe deserves full industry attention.


From Rain to Tornadoes: Situational Awareness

Western Washington weather made headlines this week with lightning, heavy rains, and even a tornado warning—a rarity in our region. While we experienced several days of limited visibility, there were no major disruptions to vessel traffic or port operations.


Maritime Operations & Collaboration

  • We are distributing the Intent to Participate for this summer’s ECHO Program slowdown to help protect Southern Resident killer whales. The Marine Exchange has supported the ECHO slowdown since its inception.
  • We continued preparations for the Coast Guard Foundation Dinner in Seattle.
  • I joined a fundraiser for Port of Seattle Commission President Toshiko Hasegawa, reinforcing our commitment to local leadership and maritime governance.
  • Next week, we’ll meet with Washington Sea Grant to begin discussions on marine traffic lane planning—a proactive step toward improving safety and environmental balance in our waters.

Technology Snapshot

  • Our AIS network remains rock solid, with >99.9% uptime across all seven towers.
  • Cybersecurity status: no anomalies detected.
  • Our database optimization project remains underway, with progress aligning with planned upgrades to our internal data systems.

Legislative Scorecard: March 28 Update

Alongside SB 5794, the Marine Exchange is actively tracking and weighing in on more than two dozen bills. A few highlights:

  • HB 1167 (Maritime CTE): Passed the House 96–0–2, now awaiting Senate action.
  • SB 5191 (Dockworker Paid Leave): Cleared the Senate and is now in House Appropriations.
  • HB 1511 / SB 5059 (Washington State Ferries Captains): Strongly supported and moving.
  • SB 5281 (Nonresident Vessel Permits): Passed the Senate unanimously; now in House.

Final Word: why we pay attention

I don’t know why exactly, but this beautiful industry in this beautiful place is taking hits from every level. Washington maritime gave me everything, so I can’t NOT protect what I love.

You may have noticed a much more aggressive stance from the Marine Exchange lately, but that’s commensurate with the amount of urgent threats that we’re facing. Trump tariffs, USTR Chinese ship fees, Seattle City Council vote to rezone industrial land, proposed legislation to impost CARB rules, “paused” EPA ports grants, reduction of NOAA personnel and capability, threatened FEMA support and paused Port Security grants all add up to an accumulation of impact that we cannot measure.

We’re paying attention because we deeply care about the fate of an industry that has given so much to so many.


Stay tuned for next week’s update, which will include results from my Olympia testimony, a recap of our WA Sea Grant meeting, and new developments around regional AIS data sharing.

If you have questions, ideas, or want to subscribe to this roundup directly, contact us here.


Patrick Gallagher
Executive Director
Marine Exchange of Puget Sound

Help Us Oppose SB 5794 – Protect Washington’s Maritime Industry & Jobs

Dear Members and Maritime Community,

I am reaching out to you with rapidly growing concern about proposed legislation that could dramatically alter the cost and competitiveness of doing business in Washington’s maritime sector.

Senate Bill 5794 (SB 5794) proposes to eliminate the Public Utility Tax (PUT) exemption for cargo movement and repeal the Business & Occupation (B&O) preferential tax rate for stevedoring and freight services. These are not loopholes—they are time-tested, well-vetted tax policies that have helped Washington remain a global gateway for trade, logistics, and jobs for nearly 100 years.

If passed, this bill would increase costs across every link of the supply chain, reduce our port competitiveness, and threaten jobs—not just within maritime, but across agriculture, manufacturing, and export-reliant industries.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR WASHINGTON

  1. Prices will increase for everyone.
    Cargo doesn’t just disappear—it reroutes or becomes more expensive. Taxing the movement of goods on ships, trucks, and trains within Washington creates a “tax pyramid”—where costs multiply with every link in the chain, impacting businesses and consumers alike.
  2. Jobs will be lost.
    Washington’s maritime and logistics sectors support thousands of family-wage jobs. A disproportionate share of these jobs are held by workers of color (34% compared to 23% of the state’s population), meaning these changes will also exacerbate inequity.
  3. Washington will fall behind.
    Other states and provinces are doing the opposite. British Columbia, South Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Virginia, and others offer tax incentives to attract cargo and grow jobs. SB 5794 would make Washington an outlier—for all the wrong reasons.
  4. Cargo will be diverted.
    Much of the cargo moving through our ports is discretionary and bound for destinations beyond Washington. If operating costs climb, shippers can easily divert this cargo to ports in Canada, California, or along the Gulf Coast.
  5. Washington exporters will lose access to containers.
    Exporters depend on imported cargo for vessels and empty containers needed for outbound shipments. If imports are driven away by higher costs, exporters—including small farms, food processors, and manufacturers—lose access to the very infrastructure they rely on.

TAX PREFERENCES ARE NOT OBSOLETE

JLARC, the Legislature’s own audit agency, recommended clarifying the objectives of these tax preferences—not eliminating them. In 2012, they voted to maintain the preferential B&O rate for stevedoring, calling it a tool for increasing port competitiveness.
Numerous public and academic studies, including from the Federal Maritime Commission and the Joint Transportation Committee, confirm the price sensitivity of Washington cargo. Tariffs and trade disruptions have already harmed Washington ports—tax increases will only compound the problem.

WHAT YOU CAN DO

  1. Sign on to the Opposition Letter
    We are organizing a joint letter of opposition to SB 5794. We invite your organization to add its name and stand with Washington’s maritime workers, exporters, and businesses. To sign on, please contact Patrick Gallagher at patrick@marexps.com as soon as possible. You can also register to testify online here.
  2. Call Your Senators – Today
    Tell your State Senator that you oppose SB 5794 and urge them to support maritime jobs and economic competitiveness. Contact your legislators here. Use this sample message when you call: “I’m calling to oppose SB 5794. Repealing maritime tax preferences will drive cargo away from Washington ports, raise prices, harm exporters, and put thousands of jobs at risk. Please protect Washington’s global trade competitiveness and vote no on SB 5794.”
  3. Spread the Word
    Share this message with your networks, port partners, trade organizations, and regional stakeholders. The more unified our voice, the stronger our case.

Washington’s maritime economy is a pillar of our state’s identity and prosperity. These tax preferences have worked for nearly a century—keeping our ports competitive, our exports flowing, and our communities employed. Now is not the time to undo that progress.
Thank you for your continued support and commitment to protecting the future of maritime trade in Washington.

Sincerely,

Patrick Gallagher
Marine Exchange of Puget Sound, Executive Director

Port Pulse: March 21, 2025 — Maritime Insights from the Watch Floor to the Capitol

lighthouse in fog

In a session shaped by fog on the water and foggier politics in Olympia, the Marine Exchange remains steady on course — committed to clarity, coordination, and context. Friends, there is A LOT happening including Seattle City Council voting 6-3 against the maritime industry and the preservation of industrial lands. Also, the Puyallup Tribe announced an agreement with the NW Seaport Alliance to develop a new terminal. This is great news that we needed.

As spring arrives in Puget Sound, so too does a changing tide in vessel traffic, port dynamics, and legislative strategy. This week’s snapshot offers insight into what’s happening on the water, in Olympia, and behind the screens of our AIS network. Here’s what stood out:

Summary

Vessel arrivals declined 27% from last week, driven primarily by a sharp drop in bulk carriers. Although bulkers display seasonal trends, this remains outside what we’d normally see, and I’m just not sure exactly what is happening in this category.

AIS network operations continue to exceed expectations, and we’re making enhancements to both our hardware (removing one piece in the chain) and software. On the policy front, budget issues now dominate Olympia, but maritime bills are still making meaningful progress.

National news for the maritime industry remains sour and uncertain. The Federal Reserve kept rates flat which stoked fears of stagflation. If you remember your Econ 101, stagflation is the worst of all worlds heralding suppressed growth and elevated unemployment. This is an economic condition that is very difficult to overcome and generally considered worse than recession.

Situational Awareness

  • Weather Impacts: Fog persisted early in the week, causing minor pilot boarding delays at Cape Flattery and within VTS Puget Sound.
  • Disruptions: None reported. A quiet week operationally.
  • Tariffs and Trade: Although new USTR fees on Chinese-flagged ships are anticipated, it hasn’t been long enough to properly gauge impacts to Washinton maritime.

Maritime Operations and Coordination

  • VTS Continuity Planning: We participated in discussions with USCG Sector Puget Sound to explore backup capabilities using our watch floor.
  • Pilotage Software Integration: Continued collaboration around Portlink and dynamic routing data.
  • NOAA Sanctuary Contract: Monitoring project is temporarily delayed due to federal budget uncertainties.
  • Podcast Guest Update: Sara told me not to tell! We have 3 new guests lined up, and we’re really stoked to bring them on the Maritime Morning Brief. Stay tuned!!

Technology and Data

  • AIS Network: All 7 towers fully operational with >99.9% uptime.
  • Platform Optimization: Database improvements underway to enhance query speeds and reduce storage load. If you receive any of our reports, you won’t notice anything different – it’s sort of like doing foundation work on your house when what you really want to do is paint the living room.
  • Cybersecurity: No threats or anomalies detected this week.

Legislative Insights: Maritime Still Afloat Amid Budget Storm

After a frenzied House of Origin cutoff week, Olympia has entered a more measured pace. The House passed over 1,000 bills to the Senate; the Senate returned just 250. This gives Senate bills a fighting chance in House committees spread across 20+ policy areas.

However, the newly released state budget forecast casts a long shadow: a $17 billion shortfall means painful cuts and potential new taxes are likely. Many bills will quietly die as attention shifts to balancing the books.

That said, 5 of the 7 bills supported by the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound are still alive:

  • SB 5191: Dockworker paid leave – executive session scheduled in House Labor Committee.
  • HB 1167: Maritime career education – advanced in Senate committee.
  • HB 1414: Broader access to CTE – heard 3/19.
  • HB 1264: Ferry collective bargaining – heard 3/17.
  • SB 5281: Nonresident vessel permit reform – heard 3/13.

Two bills we supported are likely dead:

  • SB 5059 (Washington State Ferries captains): Moved to Senate Rules “X” file.
  • SB 5248 (Bridge collision working group): Missed cutoff.

And one we opposed — HB 1689, targeting unrealistic berth emissions standards — is officially dead for now.

We’re watching the April 2 policy committee cutoff and April 8 fiscal committee cutoff. Bills marked “Necessary to Implement the Budget” (NTIB) can still survive, even if deadlines pass.


Spotlight of the Week: The Trouble With Triple-Digit Trends

This week, we saw headlines claiming a 700% increase in tanker traffic. It’s a perfect example of period bias — using extreme endpoints to manufacture an alarming stat. That said, without the underlying dataset and math, I’ve trained myself to automatically reject 231% of all triple-digit assertions.

As stewards of maritime data, we encourage stakeholders to challenge dramatic figures, demand context, and resist spin. Transparency matters more than virality.


Looking Ahead

  • NOAA Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Project update meeting held Friday
  • Meeting with Marine Exchange of Alaska + Port of Seattle this week
  • MAREXPS Podcast episode drops next week

Full Steam Ahead: Marine Exchange Welcomes Azimuth, Eyes San Juan Lane & Cloud Migration

Keeping you informed about the latest developments in the maritime industry and our community.

Legislative Updates:

  • SB 5191: This bill clarifies paid family leave premium collection for dockworkers. It has passed the Senate with amendments and is now awaiting a hearing in the House Labor & Workplace Standards Committee.
  • HB 1264: Focused on ferry system collective bargaining units, this bill has passed out of committee and is scheduled for a public hearing in the Senate Transportation Committee on March 17.
  • HB 1167: Aiming to enhance educational opportunities for careers in maritime professions, this bill is scheduled for a public hearing in the Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Committee on March 13.

Community Engagement:

  • Welcome Azimuth Offshore: We are pleased to announce that Azimuth Offshore, led by Founder & President Justin Smith, has joined the Marine Exchange. Discussions are underway for a collaborative podcast with Lena Gothberg from The Shipping Podcast to highlight maritime industry insights.
  • Whatcom Working Waterfront Coalition Recognition: Our efforts were acknowledged in the latest newsletter from the Whatcom Working Waterfront Coalition, underscoring our commitment to enhancing maritime operations in the region.

Initiatives and Collaborations:

  • San Juan Island Mariner Guidance Lane: We are coordinating with Washington Sea Grant to explore the establishment of a voluntary mariner guidance lane near San Juan Island, aiming to improve navigational safety and environmental protection.
  • Database Modernization: A demonstration is scheduled to transition our local database to a cloud-based server, enhancing data accessibility and security for our members.
  • ECHO Program Participation: Next week, we will communicate our intent to participate in the upcoming ECHO Program slowdown, contributing to the protection of marine life by reducing vessel speeds in designated areas.
  • Member Survey on Tariffs: We will be distributing a survey to gather insights on how current tariffs are impacting your operations. Your feedback is crucial for our advocacy and support efforts.

Industry News:

We remain committed to keeping our members informed and engaged. Your participation in our initiatives and feedback through surveys is invaluable as we navigate these developments together.

For more detailed information on legislative updates, please refer to the attached bill tracker.

Please stay tuned for further updates as we continue to monitor these developments.


Note: This newsletter is intended for informational purposes and reflects the latest available data as of March 14, 2025.

U.S. Trade Tariffs and Potential Impacts on Washington’s Maritime Industry

On February 4th, 2025, new U.S. tariffs will take effect, impacting trade with Canada and China. Originally, these tariffs were due to impact trade with Mexico as well, but this has been deferred for one month as Mexico has agreed to surge security personnel to the border in exchange. These measures introduce significant changes to import costs and supply chain logistics, which will have direct implications for Washington State’s ports, trade flows, and maritime operations.

Summary of Key Changes:

  • A 25% tariff on all Canadian and Mexican imports, except for energy products, which will be subject to a 10% tariff.
  • A 10% additional tariff on all Chinese imports.
  • Elimination of the de minimis rule for Canada and Mexico, meaning that low-value shipments that previously entered duty-free will now be subject to tariffs.
  • Cargo loaded before February 1st is exempt from the new tariffs.

Response and Retaliatory Measures:

  • Canada will impose 25% tariffs on $30 billion worth of U.S. goods, escalating to $155 billion in three weeks. The affected products include agriculture, alcohol, lumber, household goods, and aerospace components.
  • Mexico has negotiated a one-month extension of the U.S. tariffs by agreeing to deploy additional security personnel to the border. Details of Mexico’s potential countermeasures have not yet been announced.
  • China has filed a World Trade Organization (WTO) complaint and is preparing retaliatory countermeasures that may affect Washington’s aerospace, agricultural, and technology exports.

Potential Impacts on Washington’s Maritime Industry

Washington State is one of the most trade-dependent states in the U.S., with nearly one-third of jobs tied to international trade. The tariffs and retaliatory measures will likely have far-reaching effects on maritime commerce, including:

✔️ Higher costs for Washington importers, particularly in retail, electronics, and construction materials.
✔️ Disruptions to key agricultural exports, including apples, cherries, seafood, and dairy, which rely on Canada, Mexico, and China as major markets.
✔️ Slower container traffic at the Northwest Seaport Alliance (NWSA), which already faces challenges from shifting global trade routes and supply chain disruptions.
✔️ Increased operational uncertainty for shipping companies, freight forwarders, and terminal operators, as businesses re-evaluate sourcing and trade strategies.

What’s Next?

The executive orders authorizing these tariffs include provisions for further increases should Canada, Mexico, or China introduce additional retaliatory measures. Given the strategic importance of international trade to Washington State, the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound will continue to monitor developments and coordinate with industry stakeholders to assess potential impacts.

With additional uncertainties such as the ongoing Red Sea crisis and global shipping disruptions, Washington’s maritime industry must remain agile and prepared for shifts in trade patterns.

The Marine Exchange will provide ongoing updates and encourages stakeholders to remain engaged as these policies unfold.

The Path Forward: Uncertainty and Opportunity

Despite these challenges, Washington has a strong tradition of trade leadership and economic adaptability. Our maritime industry, ports, and businesses must:

  • Engage with policymakers to advocate for trade policies that protect Washington’s economic interests. I’ll be in Olympia tomorrow to testify on HB 1689, which proposes fully adopting California Air Resource Board (CARB) standards for ocean-going vessels at berth here in Washington.
  • Diversify markets and trade routes to reduce reliance on any single country or region. If we are to leverage our maritime industry as a means of diversification, we can’t afford to lose more industrial capacity. The Marine Exchange has opposed the City of Seattle’s proposed rezoning of maritime industrial lands and is engaged with the Seattle City Council.
  • Leverage maritime innovation to remain competitive in an increasingly complex trade environment. We’re launching an online career development center this year and bringing back the monthly agent/ops meeting that went away during COVID. Now is a time to double down on community and cooperation.

For further information, please contact us.

Hold Fast.

The Marine Exchange of Puget Sound Partners with Pinnacle Government Affairs to Advance Maritime Legislative Priorities

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 3, 2025
Contact: Patrick Gallagher
patrick@marexps 206-771-1620

Marine Exchange of Puget Sound Partners with Pinnacle
Government Affairs to Advance Maritime Legislative Priorities

Seattle, WA – The Marine Exchange of Puget Sound is proud to announce its partnership with Pinnacle Government Affairs, LLC, a premier government relations firm based in Olympia, WA. This contract underscores the Marine Exchange’s commitment to advancing the needs of its diverse membership by addressing critical legislative and policy priorities that impact the maritime industry and Puget Sound waterways.

With Pinnacle Government Affairs’ Principal, Trent Matson, bringing over 30 years of government affairs expertise, this partnership will focus on securing essential funding and support for key initiatives, including derelict gear removal, workforce development, and critical infrastructure projects. This work will also bolster the efforts of organizations such as the Puget Sound Harbor Safety Committee, ensuring that the region’s maritime operations remain safe, sustainable, and economically vital.

“I am humbled to have the opportunity to represent the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound,” said Trent Matson, Principal of Pinnacle Government Affairs. “With an outstanding list of diverse members and an incredibly knowledgeable staff, the Marine Exchange is poised to make a positive impact in Olympia. The Marine Exchange has an important story to convey to policymakers, which will benefit the sustainability of our Puget Sound waterways and working-class families simultaneously. I am excited to help make this happen.”

The Marine Exchange will continue its longstanding participation in the Washington Maritime Federation, contributing to the collective legislative agenda. This new work with Pinnacle Government Affairs will allow the Marine Exchange to pursue specific initiatives in Olympia that directly address its members’ unique needs.

Patrick Gallagher, Director of the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound, emphasized the importance of this collaboration:
“Advocating for the needs of our members is a responsibility we take seriously. Partnering with Pinnacle Government Affairs and leveraging Trent’s extensive expertise strengthens our ability to champion policies that align with our mission and complex member needs. Together, we’re committed to securing the resources and legislative support that will ensure the continued success of our maritime community.”

###

About the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound: Founded in 1980, the Marine Exchange of Puget Sound operates around the clock, delivering real-time vessel tracking data and essential administrative services to its members. With a diverse membership, the Exchange is dedicated to fostering safe, efficient, and environmentally responsible maritime operations.

About Pinnacle Government Affairs, LLC: Pinnacle Government Affairs’ Principal, Trent Matson, brings 30 years of Government Affairs experience in Olympia. Trent has a stellar reputation having built meaningful relationships with Olympia’s decision makers and a long record of successful outcomes for his clients. During his tenure, Trent has successfully navigated, on behalf of his clients, on important issues critical to economic development, working class families, and environmental balance.

Reflections on the 2024 Virginia Maritime Association Symposium: Unleashing Maritime Prosperity

I recently had the pleasure of attending the 2024 Virginia Maritime Association Symposium (VMA24), and I can say without hesitation that it was one of the most insightful and inspiring events I’ve been a part of. This symposium brought together an impressive cross-section of industry leaders, policymakers, and innovators—all of whom are dedicated to shaping the future of maritime logistics. With its sharp focus on both Virginia’s maritime sector and the broader national picture, VMA24 provided a unique blend of regional and national perspectives, creating conversations that felt forward-looking, practical, and visionary all at once.

I’ve been in the maritime industry long enough to know that these kinds of events are more than just networking opportunities; they’re catalysts for change. And in that spirit, I’m sharing my thoughts, takeaways, and reflections from VMA24, which I believe could benefit professionals not only in Virginia but also on the West Coast and other regions where maritime plays a crucial role in the local economy.

A World-Class Event with a Clear Vision

VMA24 was a world-class gathering in every sense of the word. The scope of topics discussed, the caliber of speakers, and the quality of the dialogue left no doubt about the symposium’s importance. From discussions on technological innovation to the economic realities facing the industry, every session was a reminder of the essential role maritime plays in the broader economy.

Love or hate his politics, Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin’s keynote address was particularly memorable. His phrase “unleashing prosperity” struck a chord with everyone in the room. The governor made it clear that maritime isn’t just another sector of the economy—it’s the linchpin holding the entire system together. He spoke our language and knew our pain points. His recognition of maritime as the foundation upon which Virginia’s broader economic strategy rests was both refreshing and critical in today’s economic climate. Virginia is leading the charge in supporting maritime, and it’s something that should be a model for other states, especially on the West Coast where policy and maritime often feel misaligned.

As I listened to the governor’s address, I couldn’t help but compare it to Washington State, where the business climate, ranked #42 in CNBC’s business-friendliness index, presents its own set of challenges. Washington has some of the world’s most critical maritime infrastructure and yet is held back by policies that stifle business growth. Virginia, on the other hand, has consistently been ranked the #1 state for business. The contrast was stark and got me thinking about what we can do to bridge that gap out West.

Virginia as a Business-Friendly Hub: Lessons for Washington State

One of the key takeaways from VMA24 is the way Virginia has positioned itself as a business-friendly hub. The CNBC ranking speaks volumes, but it’s the “why” behind that ranking that caught my attention. Virginia has cultivated a policy environment that reduces regulatory burdens, encourages innovation, and makes it easier for businesses to thrive. When you combine that with its strong maritime infrastructure, you have the perfect conditions for a booming economy.

The maritime sector benefits from this business-friendly climate in ways that go beyond tax incentives or regulatory simplicity. Ports are functioning efficiently because the state has made it a priority. I was struck by the coordinated efforts between government and private enterprises to ensure that Virginia’s ports remain competitive in the global marketplace.

For those of us working on the West Coast, where regulatory challenges often slow down progress, there’s a clear lesson to be learned here. Washington State’s maritime sector is strong, but it’s clear that we need to push harder to align policy with the needs of our ports and maritime businesses. We have the talent, the resources, and the global connections, but we’re being held back by policies that, quite frankly, are outdated in today’s competitive global economy.

The Role of AI and Technology in Maritime: The Future Is Here

Another powerful theme from VMA24 was the role of technology, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), in transforming the maritime industry. This wasn’t just a buzzword conversation; the panelists made it clear that AI is already reshaping logistics and shipping, and its influence will only grow in the years to come.

There were compelling discussions about how AI is being integrated into final-mile logistics and intermodal systems, making freight more efficient and competitive. Ports are increasingly relying on predictive analytics to manage ship traffic, optimize terminal operations, and reduce congestion. AI is giving logistics providers the tools to make smarter, faster decisions—especially as global trade becomes more complex and prone to disruptions.

For example, we’re seeing AI being used to predict port congestion weeks in advance, helping shippers avoid costly delays. And let’s not forget about automation: It’s inevitable. While there are understandable concerns about job displacement, the reality is that automation is going to be essential for ports that want to remain competitive. With labor shortages and the ever-growing demand for faster shipping, there’s no way around it.

As someone who’s worked closely with maritime data and logistics, I found these discussions on AI particularly engaging. We’ve been talking about data-driven decision-making for years, but the level of sophistication we’re now seeing—especially with machine learning models that can optimize everything from ship routes to container loading—is incredible. The integration of AI isn’t a far-off dream; it’s here, and ports on both coasts need to embrace it fully if they want to stay ahead.

Disruptors: Navigating the Uncertainty

Of course, no conversation about maritime in 2024 would be complete without addressing the major disruptors we’re all facing. VMA24 didn’t shy away from tackling the tough issues. From the geopolitical crisis in the Red Sea to the looming ILA (International Longshoremen’s Association) strike in January, there are a lot of unknowns on the horizon.

One of the panelists used the collapse of the Key Bridge in Baltimore as a metaphor for how fragile our infrastructure can be. It was a stark reminder that we often take for granted the critical systems that keep goods flowing. If one key piece of infrastructure fails—be it a bridge, a port, or a terminal—it can bring entire supply chains to a halt. And in today’s interconnected global economy, the ripple effects can be devastating.

The consensus at VMA24 was that resilience is key. We can’t prevent every disruption, but we can build more flexibility into our supply chains. Whether that means investing in alternative routes, stockpiling critical goods, or building out redundancy in infrastructure, the maritime industry needs to be prepared for the unexpected. The West Coast is no stranger to disruptions, with its own set of unique challenges—earthquakes, wildfires, and labor unrest—but we would do well to adopt some of the resilience-building strategies discussed in Virginia.

Sustainability and the Push for Alternative Fuels

Sustainability was another central theme at VMA24, and it’s clear that the maritime industry is at a turning point. The conversation around alternative fuels has moved beyond regulatory compliance and into the realm of competitive advantage. Virginia is positioning itself as a leader in sustainable maritime practices, investing heavily in research and development around alternative fuels. Panelists pointed out that there’s a growing alignment between sustainability and profitability—companies that embrace greener shipping methods are not only reducing their environmental impact but also gaining a competitive edge.

This is a conversation we need to have on the West Coast as well. Washington’s ports have made strides in reducing emissions, but there’s so much more we could be doing. With the global push toward decarbonizing the shipping industry, the Pacific Northwest is in a unique position to lead, but only if we’re willing to invest in the necessary infrastructure and technologies. As someone who’s been in the maritime industry for decades, I can say with certainty that the companies that fail to adapt to this new reality will be left behind.

Standardizing Maritime Data and Information Sharing

Another technical but critical topic that was explored in depth at VMA24 was the need for standardized data across the maritime industry. The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) has begun establishing data standards that will facilitate better information sharing between ports, carriers, and shippers. This is particularly important in areas like demurrage and detention charges, which continue to cause friction between stakeholders.

Panelists stressed that data silos are one of the biggest obstacles to efficiency in maritime logistics. When information isn’t shared freely or standardized across systems, it creates inefficiencies and increases costs. By harmonizing data, the FMC is laying the groundwork for a more transparent and efficient global supply chain. It’s not glamorous work, but it’s essential for the future of the industry.

For someone like me, who’s spent a good portion of my career dealing with maritime logistics, this is music to my ears. We’ve been talking about the need for better data sharing for years, and it’s exciting to see real progress being made. If ports on the West Coast can adopt these standards and work more collaboratively with their counterparts on the East Coast, we could see significant improvements in efficiency and cost reduction.

Closing Thoughts: Lessons for the West Coast

As I reflect on VMA24, I’m struck by how many of the lessons from Virginia are applicable to other parts of the country, especially the West Coast. The focus on building resilience, embracing technology, fostering business-friendly policies, and investing in sustainability are all things we need to be prioritizing on our side of the country. Virginia’s approach is a model worth studying and, in many ways, emulating.

For those of us in the maritime industry, whether we’re on the East Coast, West Coast, or somewhere in between, the message is clear: The future is full of challenges, but it’s also full of opportunities. The question is, are we willing to adapt, innovate, and invest in the future.

Navigating the Future of PacNW Maritime

Pacific NW Maritime industry

In case you missed it, the Marine Exchange had a fantastic turnout for a software demo.

If you’re rolling your eyes right now (oh boy, more software), I’ll start by acknowledging that software may be eating the world, but this was much more valuable as a gathering to talk about what drives us and what problems we need to solve. It was the most candid conversation I’ve witnessed since starting with the Marine Exchange almost three years ago. Because of this, I am grateful, energized, and genuinely inspired. I want to extend a heartful thank you to everyone who gathered in our conference room and later on our rooftop. For everyone who followed up with me, I want to tell you that your message is loud and clear.

It does not serve us to shield the fact that the maritime industry in Washington state is struggling. The ship count is down, cargo loads have not recovered like nearly every other port in the US, and we’ve been experiencing a long slide downward for thirty years as we’ve voluntarily donned the yoke of fearful bureaucracy, stagnation, and under-investment. The Northwest Seaport Alliance is trailing with a negative 27% growth rate since 2006, measuring year-on-year container volume growth. Some lines of business are doing fine (cruise, RO/RO), but I look at the aggregate activity, and it’s clear that we’re in decline and lacking deep, sustaining investment.

Northwest Seaport Alliance growth chart
Source: Pacific Merchant Shipping Association. My goal is to help invert this graph.

The question is, what do we do about it? I think we start by acknowledging that we have entered silos that tend to ossify slowly amidst retraction almost without notice. There are systemic problems here that I believe are untangled only with collaboration and trust – so easy, right? Imagine going to work on Monday and having someone tell you our new strategy is collaboration and trust when what you really need is a bunch of trucks. Inverting this graph is a decision made by people energized by a mission. I believe in this.

No software can solve this unless the people involved are committed to sharing ideas and information vital to telling the whole story. What bothers me is that I genuinely believe that we’re best at this. I say this because I’ve been stationed in many places and seen many ports operate around the country, so I approach this as a relatively objective outsider.

Follow-up question: Do we want to do anything about it? If Harbor Island becomes a theme park in the next 20 years, we’ll have our answer. However, it’s a valid question.

Our geography should be a significant selling point, as should our access to innovation, abundant clean energy, and incredible safety record. We know how to do this right, yet the narrative seems to be that we need more regulation, restrictions, and oversight by people who lack a basic understanding of what it takes to bring a ship across an ocean and into port. I have been shocked by the power and influence of industry consultants and overseers who couldn’t tell me the difference between a dead cat and a dead reckoning.

Author, exuding maritime dominance.

I am desperate for us to be heard. We have a world-class story, and I don’t think it’s getting out comprehensively. The truth is that PacNW Maritime is the jewel of the industry. That may sound corny, but I believe it. It’s hard to watch it struggle when it could be such a potent driver of the future and provide so much for so many people, including jobs with purpose and dignity, while we fulfill the most pressing needs of our civilization.

I could continue, but I will stop as I risk waxing overly saccharine. Please know that the Marine Exchange is intimately connected to the success of this industry in a way that I don’t believe any other organization is. We’re not a national association – we live and die with WA Maritime. We’re not eyeing global moonshot schemes – we’re looking to our backyard for opportunity and incremental improvement. We’re not disruptors looking to pick through bones – we’re committed to growing the corpus for future generations. Our core is to make all of Washington state a maritime leader in the United States, believing that if we become more competitive, the entire world will benefit.


Here’s what I’m reading:

  1. Maritime Administration Strategic Plan 2022-2026. MARAD has an undeniably massive responsibility in the future of US Maritime. I hope that their modest near-term vision is fully supported.
  2. PMSA West Coast Trade Report, April 2024.The numbers don’t lie. Jordan Royer’s opinion piece in April’s Trade Report partially inspired this blog post.
  3. The Algebra of Wealth. Professor Scott Galloway’s new bestseller is accessible and personal but doesn’t shy away from more complex macroeconomic concepts that contextualize capitalism for a mass audience. Although it is intended for young people, my kids at home just rolled their eyes when they saw me reading it.

Here’s what I’m interested in right now:

  1. Claude.ai. I’m figuring out how this differs from chatgpt and which Artificial Intelligence overlord I will eventually serve.
  2. Franklin on Apple TV. I watched the first episode using someone else’s login, which I’m sure Apple already knows. I like this trend of dramatic history — especially as Benjamin Franklin’s plight is essentially for maritime dominance.
  3. Midst Podcast. This podcast is a captivating space western (yes, that’s a thing) that hooked me almost immediately. I’m listening to the final season with my daughter and trying not to ruin it by pointing out how important reliable supply lines are within this intriguing science fiction realm.

Here’s what I’m doing:

  1. Planting tomatoes. Do I need more evidence that the PacNW sucks for growing tomatoes? We shall see. Also, the USDA zone map changed… thanks, climate change.
  2. Shopping for a mid-life crisis car. I’ve got it down to a Mercedes SL55 AMG or any affordable Porsche (yeah, right). I was initially gunning for a 1964 Ford Galaxie 500XL like I drove when I was 30, but is that too overtly midlife?
image credit: pinterest

I’m wishing you the very best and safest May ever.

— Patrick Gallagher

Build vs Buy, Decarbonization, and Maritime Day 2024

WA state ferry being towed

*This photo has been generated using artificial intelligence. While it may appear realistic, it is important to note that it was not captured by a human photographer.*

Buying Ships

Washington State Ferries should follow the Coast Guard’s lead and just buy a ferry (or 5). I’m referring to the Coast Guard’s plea to buy a commercially available icebreaker for $150 million. If it were up to the Coast Guard, this would’ve happened years ago as we’ve watched the heavy icebreaking capability erode slowly over time down at Pier 36. 

The level of urgency surrounding our lack of presence in the receding ice of the Arctic is now surpassing our level of commitment to lobbying for ship design and manufacturing dollars. Still, where there’s billions at stake, there’s a fight

But, alas — Politics. It’s not until we’re out of options that we loosen protectionist legislation. Looking at you, Jones Act.

  • PMSA West Coast Trade Report is out. Read the section on the export of recycled material. This is a “must read” for me and I always plan on at least an hour to absorb it. The short version for us is that the containerized cargo trade for the NW Seaport Alliance is down from 3.1 million TEUs a year ago to 2.7 million TEUs in November. This is below COVID numbers.
  • Port decarbonization buzz is everywhere. I attended 3 different discussions in the past week where this was a primary talking point.
  • Tug Escort Rulemaking workshop wrapped another session last week. I missed the last workshop but reviewed their timeline and finally read their public comments which closed last April. This isn’t over, but the major rub seems to be whether the increased tug traffic (emissions, noise, congestion) is worth the risk being bought down by the increased tug presence. Stay tuned.
  • Maritime Day is today! Members of the WA Maritime Federation will be engaging state legislators on a full spectrum of maritime-related policy and funding issues.
This is my first blog post, but it’s really just a way for me to keep track of top issues and what I’ve been paying attention to over the past two weeks. I realize some of my opinions or thoughts may not completely align with yours or your organization, but my goal is to simply provide some fact-based commentary and awareness that you may not get anywhere else.